Model Validity: How Good is the Fit?
The validity and reliability of market models must be assessed in terms of statistical accuracy as well as practicality. Is the model commonsensical? Does it meet the required accuracy standards?
Metrics/tests that help assess the goodness-of-fit and the reliability of the model include:
- Adjusted R2 (coefficient of determination): measures the proportion of the variation in the dependent variable (Sales) accounted for by the explanatory variables (Marketing Mix variables). It adjusts for the degrees of freedom associated with the sums of the squares.
- Estimated Standard Error: provides the average error for the model as a whole and can be used to calculate confidence intervals for forecasts and scenario simulations.
- Tests to assess the significance of the individual coefficients, i.e. the α and β values, which represent key parameters such as base and the elasticity of demand.
- Holdout tests to assess the reliability of the model. These tests use the estimated model coefficients to predict the sales for a further 8 to 12 weeks. The sales prediction is then compared with the actual sales data of those weeks to assess the quality of the model.
- Tests to check for bias. Bias occurs when any variables that influence sales are omitted or when spurious variables are included. If a variable is overlooked, its effect is incorrectly allocated to the remaining variables that comprise the model. This results in the distortion of the importance of these variables.
Because it is easier to comprehend, greater emphasis is given to the R2 measures. It is important however that due consideration is given to all the above tests, or else the conclusions derived from the model could well be misleading.
Note: To find content on MarketingMind type the acronym ‘MM’ followed by your query into the search bar. For example, if you enter ‘mm consumer analytics’ into Chrome’s search bar, relevant pages from MarketingMind will appear in Google’s result pages.
Promotions Evaluation
Automated online solution for analysis of promotions.
What they SHOULD TEACH at Business Schools
Is marketing education fluffy too?
Experiential Learning via Simulators | Best Way to Train Marketers
Marketing simulators impart much needed combat experiences, equipping practitioners with the skills to succeed in the consumer market battleground. They combine theory with practice, linking the classroom with the consumer marketplace.
Online Apps for training on Promotions
The Plannogrammer is an experiential learning facility for category managers, trade marketers, and retailers in consumer markets. Ideally suited for hybrid learning programmes, Plannogrammer imparts hands-on training in the planning and evaluation of promotions and merchandising.
It supports a collection of simulation and analysis platforms such as Promotions and Space Planner for optimizing space and promotions, Plannogram for populating shelves and merchandising, a Due To Analysis dashboard that decomposes brand sales into the factors driving sales, and a Promotion Evaluator to evaluate the volume, value and profit impact of promotion plans.
