Case Example — Johnson’s Body Care


https://www.kikaycorner.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Dual-Moisture-Bond-Print-Ad.jpg

Exhibit 7.21   An advertisement of Johnson’s Body Wash and Johnson’s H&B lotion.

Johnson’s, a brand that cuts across multiple categories, is a leading brand in hand & body (H&B) lotion and body wash — two categories where market dynamics differs greatly. H&B lotion is a small relatively quiet market where Johnson’s often maintains a dominant leadership position. Body wash on the other hand is a cutthroat business with thin margins, as big global brands jostle for market share.

Some years back Johnson’s regional leadership was exploring ways to exploit the synergy of the brand across the two categories. They had a few questions on their minds — Could Johnson’s equity transcend categories? Could they leverage the brand’s equity from one category to another? If so, that would open opportunities to strengthen the brand as well as optimize costs in brand building.

At Nielsen, we picked the Singapore market for in-depth study of the Johnson’s brand. One of the analysis, depicted in Exhibit 7.22, provides a break-up of the 21% Johnson’s buyers into three buyers groups — those who bought Johnson’s H&B only (H&B only — 24% of buyers), those who bought Johnson’s Body Wash only (BW only — 56% of buyers) and those who bought both Johnson’s H&B and Johnson’s Body Wash (H&B + BW — 20% of buyers).  For each of the three buyer groups, we examined their behavioural loyalty to the Johnson’s brand within H&B and body wash.

Considering Johnson’s dominant position in H&B, it did not come as a surprise that loyalty for Johnson’s H&B was high (65-66%) for both H&B only and H&B + BW buyer groups. What caught our attention, however, was the much higher loyalty of 46% for Johnson’s Body Wash, among H&B + BW buyers, compared to the 28% loyalty, among BW only buyers.

Also revealing was the cross basket analysis of Johnson’s H&B buyers. Exhibit 7.23 depicts the body wash basket of purchases by the Johnson’s H&B buyers’ buyer group. Within this group, Johnson’s Body Wash had a commanding share of 27.5% — which is exceptionally high when compared with the 9.5% market share of Johnson’s Body Wash, within the panel population as a whole.

In the context of buyer groups, the share of Johnson’s Body Wash in total market (9.5%) is called the “fair share” — i.e. the share we would expect if there was nothing extraordinary about a buyer group. The index 27.5/9.5 (= 290 re-based to 100), called the fair share index, is extraordinarily high. It tells us that the propensity of a Johnson’s H&B buyer to buy Johnson’s Body Wash, is 2.9 times higher (in terms of value) than that for the average brand buyer.


Exhibit 7.20   Cross category overlap analysis: Johnson’s Hand & Body and Body Wash.

The cross category overlap analysis, and the cross basket analysis suggested that Johnson’s brand equity transcended the categories; that there existed a strong synergistic relationship. Consumers buying both Johnson’s product were much more loyal to Johnson’s Body Wash. This synergy was leveraged via subsequent marketing efforts such as the joint Johnson’s body care advertisement, in Exhibit 7.19, of Johnson’s Body Wash and Johnson’s H&B lotion. 



Exhibit 7.23   Cross basket analysis — Johnson’s H&B buyers’ share of purchases in body wash.

Previous     Next

Note: To find content on MarketingMind type the acronym ‘MM’ followed by your query into the search bar. For example, if you enter ‘mm consumer analytics’ into Chrome’s search bar, relevant pages from MarketingMind will appear in Google’s result pages.







Demo - Cross Basket

Demo - Cross Basket

Demo of Cross Basket analysis on the Delphi analytics platform.