Each dashboard is a collection of reports containing the type of information that
is used by brand managers and category managers at consumer marketing and retailing firms. Data such as
market size, share, trade contribution and in-store promotions is obtained by these companies from
retail tracking services. Information on perceptions and
brand image
is obtained from
quantitative research studies, and information on media and
advertising is
obtained from media tracking services. Vendors for these services include Nielsen, the Kantar Group,
Ipsos and IRI.
Market Dashboard is specially configured for
reviewing market trends. The report enables you to gauge the size of the
market, its growth rate, and the performance of retailers, manufacturers,
brands, channels and segments. It covers information on sales volume, sales
value and price, across all channels and chains, and across all segments.
The dashboard is ideal for examining the impact of marketing activities
on the market as a whole, and across channels, banners and segments.
The data shown in the video is for the Hygenia category. The tabs and the
spin buttons at the top of the page, pertain to selections for dashboard,
metric, segment, channel and category.
The chart on the right depicts the share for big brands and the one on the
left pertains to the remaining brands.
As is the case with all the dashboards, the market dashboard is a collection of
tables, and each table is a collection of views.
The data can be viewed across the 5 different channels and chains, including
total trade. It can also view across the 5 different segments. So there are
25 tables for each trade/segment combination, and since the tables can be
viewed in volume or value, there are 50 views per category,
each providing a different perspective of the market share data. You normally
tend to view only a few of these perspectives.
Share in Segment and Segment Contribution
Depending on the information you are seeking or the business
issue you are studying, you need to examine the data in different ways. For
instance, at times you are interested in the market as a whole, and at other
times you want to zoom into a particular market breakdown (MBD) such as a
chain or a particular segment. If you are interested in your brand’s
performance in a segment or chain, you should examine the brand’s share in
that market breakdown. On the other hand, if you want to know the importance
of the segment or chain, examine its contribution. Contribution relates not only
to your brand’s share in the MBD, but also to the size of the MBD.
For instance, a Hygenia brand may have relatively high share in
the Hedonist segment, and because the segment is by far the biggest segment,
its contribution to the brand’s sales is likely to be huge.
Sales
Total
Hedonist
Beauty
Family
Price
Hygenia
10000
5000
2200
1400
1400
Iris
2000
1250
200
300
250
Schisandra
2000
750
600
400
250
Others
6000
3000
1400
700
900
Table 2.2 Sales volume (for illustration only) of
selected Hygenia brands, across consumer segments.
For a better understanding of the difference between market share and segment contribution, consider
Table 2.2. Based on the data in this table, it may be concluded that Iris is relatively strong in the
Hedonist segment, and that the segment is contributing 62.5% to the brand’s total
sales:
Iris’ market share is 20% in the total market and 25%
in the Hedonist segment.
The Hedonist segment’s contribution to Iris’ sales is 62.5%.
The Hedonist segment’s contribution to Hygenia sales is 50%.
Share in Trade and Trade Contribution
Sales
Total
Fujimart
Inulas
Lower Trade
Hygenia
10000
2400
1800
5800
Iris
2000
600
400
1000
Schisandra
2000
800
400
800
Others
6000
1000
1000
4000
Table 2.3 Sales volume of selected Hygenia brands,
across chains and lower trade.
Table 2.3 displays the break-up of sales across chains and the lower trade. This data
tell us that:
Iris’ market share is 20% (total Joka market).
Iris’ market share in Fujimart is 25%.
Fujimart’s contribution to Iris’ sales is 30%.
Fujimart’s contribution to Hygenia sales is 24%.
One may drill deeper into the data, for instance, segment share within
chain. If the Iris brand manager is interested in determining what proportion
of Iris sales in Fujimart are to the Hedonists, she should select ‘Fujimart’
from the Trade Channel tab at the top, of the dashboard.
If however, she is interested in information pertaining to shopper segments
(price conscious, quality conscious, convenience seekers and experimenters), she can obtain
the required information from the trade dashboard.
This dashboard also provides information on price, weighted across the 13 weeks of the
quarter. This is essentially sales value divided by sales volume.
Trade Dashboard provides for a detailed review of the
performance of the retail chains and the lower trade. The information provided
includes:
Sales volume and sales value contribution across retail chains
and channels, and across shopper segment.
Store count.
Store maintenance.
Facings.
The 3 charts at the top sum up the performance of Fujimart, Inulas and the Lower Trade.
The chart at the left pertains to trade contribution. For the category as a whole, the chart
in the video tells us that for Q4, 33.5% of the sales of Hygenia are through Fujimart, 28.3% from Inulas
and the remainder from the Lower Trade. Fujimart is bigger than Inulas, and it is particularly
strong among quality conscious shoppers, as can be seen once you select ‘quality conscious’
from the segments drop down list.
The charts in the middle and right pertain to Price and Promotion, two of the factors that
contribute to the trends in trade contribution. The average price of Hygenia products is
significantly higher in Inulas, and promotional activity in the chain, is a substantially
higher, peaking in Q3 and Q4.
Video/Table 2.4 Purchase Dashboard: Schisandra — Purchases, Sales and Stocks.
Purchase Dashboard provides information across brands
on sales volume, purchases, stocks and out of stock days. This information is
required by retailers for making purchasing decisions, and it is required by
manufacturers for determining how much to produce.
Relationship between Opening Stock, Closing Stock and Purchases
The two column charts at the top left and middle pertain to brand purchases, opening stock, sales and
closing stock. With reference to Table 2.4, for the brand Schisandra
at Inulas, notice that in Q4, the purchase volume (32.6)
+ opening stock (5.6) is equal to the sales volume (29.8) + closing stock
(8.4) in the next chart.
(Sales = Purchases + Opening Stock − Closing Stock. Refer
MarketingMind).
Purchasing Decisions
Details provided in the table in this dashboard are required by retailers for making purchasing
decisions. Manufacturers too need this information so that they can produce adequate quantities to cater to
retailer purchases.
Note that for Q2 (Table 2.4), Inulas purchased 29.5 thousand units of Schisandra and sold 29.6 thousand units. The closing
stock of 100 in Q1 is the opening stock for Q2.
The purchased quantity and the opening stock was entirely sold out, leaving no closing stock in Q2. Importantly
too, the chain experienced 4 days of stock outs. Since each quarter is a little over 90 days, the chain was
out of stock for about 4.4% of the time.
One may conclude that Inulas lost the opportunity to sell more Schisandra because it did not purchase adequate
quantities.
The information on sales trend, closing stock and the stock out days suggests that Inulas should be purchasing
more units in the next quarter, because the demand in Q2 was higher than what was available for sale.
Moreover, to minimize the likelihood of a stock out, the chain should be maintaining adequate stock levels.
Depending on the shoppers’ loyalty to the brand, persistent stock outs could compel shoppers to switch stores.
This will impair the retailer’s performance not only for the brand and the category, but also for the other
categories stocked by the retailer.
Maintaining too much excess stock is also detrimental. In part because inventory holding cost is 2%. Importantly
for perishables, stocks need to be cleared before they expiry.
Stock Cover (Stock Cover Days): Number of days that stock would last,
assuming sales continue at the same rate. This measure is used for managing supplies in
trade.
Example: If stock is 300 units and sales is 600 units per quarter (91 days), then
stock cover days = 300/600 = half a quarter, or about 45 days.
If the opening stock is 300 units (i.e. the stock level at start of
quarter) and you are expecting to sell 600 units during the quarter,
and you want to maintain 30 days of stocks, i.e. desired closing stock
is about one third of quarterly sales or 200 units, then you need to purchase 500 units:
Promotion Dashboard provides information on retailer displays,
co-op advertising and price discount (price-off) promotions.
Promo Type
Description
Rating
Price-off
0.5 to 5(-)%
2
5 to 10(-)%
4
10 to 15(-)%
6
15 to 20(-)%
8
20% or more
10
Display
Small
2
Medium
4
Large
6
Feature
Quarter
3
(Co-op ad)
Half
5
Full
7
Table 2.5 Promotions Rating Points.
The weight or magnitude of a promotion, measured in terms of promotions rating points (PRP), is a function of the type of promotion, and its frequency and scale. For example, a
small display has a rating of 2 points, a medium display has rating of 4 points
and a large display has rating of 6 points. A complete list of promo types and their
rating is provided in Table 2.5.
Based on the rating scale, a 12% price-off promotion
supported with a large display and a quarter size co-operative feature ad,
running for 3 weeks will amass 45 rating points i.e. 3 × (6+6+3).
Brand image rating (top 2 boxes — Strongly Agree/Agree). A brand’s image is shaped by the emphasis
in its advertising as well as the advertising spend levels.
Brand image profile. Refer MarketingMind for an understanding of how the image profile is computed.
Advertising spend.
Advertising emphasis.
The WT column provides the segment importance weights for the Rating, Profile
and Ad Emphasis tables. For the Share in Segment table, the values under this
column reflect the weighted average image rating for the brand, across each segment.
Product Dashboard provides relevant information for product
design and development. Details include product ingredient composition, cost of
ingredients, product utility (product quality), utility index, price index,
listed (undiscounted) trade price and material cost.
Utility
Utility is a measure of preference for a product, in terms of its performance. If product A’s utility is greater than that for product B, it means that on average consumers prefer A over B. Similarly, the extent to which a product’s formulation has improved can be measured in term the increase in its utility. (Refer handbook).
The relationship between composition of ingredients and their utility or part-worth is derived
from conjoint analysis, a technique for designing and developing products. For
the food and personal care categories in Destiny, the relationship is quadratic or ideal point.
As ingredient composition is increased the part-worth rises up to an optimum level. Further increase in composition is not advisable as it will result in loss of utility.
Besides the optimum level, product developers need to know the importance of the ingredients in terms of their contribution to the product’s utility. Nectar, for instance, contributes more than any other ingredient to the utility of ambrosia products.
The optimum level (opt) and relative importance (imp) of ingredients is shown at the right of the ingredients table in the product dashboard. The utility curve, i.e. the mathematical relationship between the ingredient composition and part-worth is depicted in the
ingredient workbook under the resources tab.
Product development typically requires trade-offs between quality and material costs. Use the utility
function and the data on cost of ingredients to achieve the desired improvement in product quality
at minimum cost.
Utility Index and Price Index
An Index is a normalized average. If the product’s utility is equal to the weighted
average utility of products in the market, it will have an index of 100. Similarly, if a
product’s price index is 100, that means the product’s price is exactly the same as the weighted
average price of products in the category. If the product’s price index is greater than 100, it
means on weighted average its price is higher than that for competing products.
A product’s price index may be computed as follows:
Price index = Wtd Average Product Price / Wtd average Price for Category × 100
Weighted average Product Price = Product’s Sales Value / Product’s Sales Volume.
Weighted average Price for Category = Total Category Value / Total Category Volume.
Because it is a weighted ratio, the utility index (or price index) can change, even
if there is no change in the product’s composition (or its price). Indices are also be affected
when the proportion of sales across brands (i.e., market share) changes.
Price Performance Gap
Product quality and price, are among the key factors that determine brand choice.
Comparison between a product’s utility index and price index provides an understanding of
the price performance gap. If the utility index is greater than the price index, the product
offers relatively good value for money.
Configured for diagnosing the health of a brand, the brand dashboard
provides information on the metrics driving brand sales and profitability:
Price and price index, across the chains.
Product quality in terms of its utility index. If the product’s utility index
is greater than its price index, it would tend to be perceived as imparting good value for money.
Market share across segments and across chains.
Advertising spend and share of voice (% of spend).
Commercial Dashboard is configured to impart an understanding of
the ingredient cost and gross margin of the products. It also provides information on
the production capacities.
Measures include:
Trade price. This is the listed price of the product, and it excludes
any trade discounts.
Material cost or the cost of the products’ ingredients.
Cost break-up across the ingredients.
Gross margin = Trade price (listed) − material cost.
(Discounts to trade are excluded).
Ingredient composition.
Ingredient cost per kg.
Production capacity.
Note that for trade price and ingredient cost, the relevant tables also
provide information on the current decision time periods, i.e. the next two quarters.
Prices at Different Stages of the Supply Chain
As with any commercial setting, prices at different stages of the supply chain will impact
your company’s performance in Destiny. These include:
The price at which manufacturers purchase ingredients. This determines
the product cost.
List price. This is the regular (undiscounted) price at which the
product is sold by the manufacturer to the retailer. Besides this dashboard, list prices are
displayed in the decision templates and the P&Ls. They are set 6 months in advance.
The actual transfer price may not be the same as the list price.
It is usually discounted after the negotiations kick in.
Regular Shelf price. Manufacturers do not get to see this price.
(Retailers set this price in their decision template, and it appears in their P&L).
Actual Shelf price is the price at which the product is sold to
shoppers in the store. It may vary each week depending on the price-off discounts.
The prices in market and trade dashboard are the weighted average
prices at which products are sold to shoppers. They are weighted
over the 13 weeks in the quarter
(= total value sales in the quarter / total volume sold in the quarter).
ALL
Dashboards — General
The Dashboards provide broad based information pertaining to the markets, including metrics on the market size and share, trade dynamics, advertising, brand image, product development and commercial. Updated after each decision cycle, they are designed to address the diverse information needs of retailers and manufacturers.
The metrics:
Market size in volume, value, share and price, with break-ups
across segments and brands, within each retail chain.
Advertising Spend, Aided Advertising Awareness and Spontaneous
Brand Awareness.
Advertising Message in terms of the Emphasis on different image
attributes.
Brand Image ratings.
Brand Profile.
Product Composition in terms of the proportion of each ingredient.
Ingredient Cost.
Product performance in terms of utility.
Trade performance across categories and manufacturers.
Trade Purchases and Stock levels across chains.
Trade Promotions.
Banner Image Ratings and Profile.
Historical data pertaining to Year 1 for the above measures is
also provided in the Appendix.
×
Y1
Y2
Y1 Q1
Y1 Q2
Y1 Q3
Y1 Q4
Y2 Q1
Y2 Q2
Y2 Q3
Y2 Q4
Market Share (%Volume)
–
Ambrosia
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
M1-Ambrosia
54.8
54.3
53.1
54.1
55.6
56.6
57.8
55.2
53.4
51.2
M2-Ambrosia
15.1
12.0
17.1
16.0
14.0
13.2
12.5
12.1
9.9
13.3
M3-Ambrosia
20.7
17.6
22.2
20.3
20.8
19.5
16.6
16.8
19.6
17.3
Nagara Drink
5.6
3.6
6.3
5.4
5.8
4.8
4.1
3.7
3.5
3.2
Athena Drink
49.3
50.7
46.8
48.6
49.8
51.8
53.7
51.4
49.8
48.0
Ginko Drink
9.3
6.7
10.0
9.7
9.0
8.7
8.1
7.4
5.8
5.5
Haw
2.5
1.7
3.0
3.0
2.2
1.8
1.9
1.7
1.7
1.4
Kew
3.2
2.6
4.0
3.3
2.7
2.7
2.5
3.1
2.4
2.2
Jasmine
1.1
4.2
Mahonia Drink
11.6
8.2
12.1
10.8
11.9
11.4
8.9
9.2
7.9
7.0
Aloe Indica
9.1
7.3
10.1
9.5
8.9
8.1
7.7
7.6
7.3
6.5
Tritoma
2.1
4.4
3.8
Fuji Drink
4.2
6.5
3.8
4.4
4.1
4.6
5.3
6.3
6.9
7.6
Inula Drink
5.2
9.6
3.8
5.2
5.5
6.1
7.8
9.6
10.3
10.7
Volume '000
+
Ambrosia
4,677
4,930
1,165
1,161
1,172
1,179
1,205
1,219
1,242
1,263
M1-Ambrosia
2,564
2,679
619
628
651
667
697
673
663
647
M2-Ambrosia
704
590
199
185
164
156
151
148
123
168
M3-Ambrosia
969
866
259
236
244
230
200
205
243
218
Nagara Drink
260
179
73
63
67
56
49
46
44
40
Athena Drink
2,305
2,500
546
565
583
611
648
627
619
607
Ginko Drink
437
329
117
112
106
103
98
90
72
69
Haw
118
82
36
35
26
21
23
21
21
18
Kew
149
126
47
38
32
32
31
38
30
28
Jasmine
53
53
Mahonia Drink
541
405
141
126
140
134
107
112
98
88
Aloe Indica
428
358
117
110
104
96
93
93
91
82
Tritoma
102
54
48
Fuji Drink
199
321
45
51
48
54
63
76
86
96
Inula Drink
241
475
44
61
64
72
94
117
128
135
Price ($/kg)
+
Ambrosia
21.95
22.45
21.67
21.98
22.03
22.11
22.54
22.15
22.58
22.51
M1-Ambrosia
25.21
26.33
25.02
25.20
25.12
25.48
26.09
26.26
26.55
26.44
M2-Ambrosia
23.10
23.26
22.50
23.03
23.53
23.51
23.91
23.37
23.60
22.34
M3-Ambrosia
16.23
18.02
15.77
16.52
16.62
16.03
16.66
16.32
19.02
19.73
Nagara Drink
13.95
14.97
13.87
14.05
14.06
13.82
14.80
14.55
15.06
15.55
Athena Drink
26.47
27.14
26.51
26.44
26.39
26.55
26.94
27.11
27.37
27.15
Ginko Drink
27.62
28.34
27.68
27.59
27.51
27.69
27.94
28.19
28.75
28.70
Haw
14.23
14.74
14.17
14.23
14.21
14.34
14.37
14.36
15.03
15.33
Kew
16.88
17.43
15.90
17.72
18.01
16.17
18.13
16.76
17.25
17.76
Jasmine
18.83
18.83
Mahonia Drink
17.05
17.60
16.27
17.70
17.65
16.65
17.84
17.02
17.48
18.16
Aloe Indica
15.19
16.00
15.16
15.18
15.25
15.15
15.31
15.46
16.21
17.15
Tritoma
26.75
26.50
27.04
Fuji Drink
13.86
14.27
13.81
13.82
13.91
13.91
13.61
13.86
14.43
14.91
Inula Drink
13.63
13.13
13.62
13.61
13.63
13.64
12.59
12.63
13.28
13.81
Share in Segment (%Vol)
+
All
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Price
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Health
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Functional
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Connoisseur
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Share in Trade (%Vol)
+
Total Trade
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Fujimart
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Inulas
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Upper Trade
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Lower Trade
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Price in Trade ($/kg)
+
Total Trade
21.95
22.45
21.67
21.98
22.03
22.11
22.54
22.15
22.58
22.51
Fujimart
20.46
21.72
19.94
20.31
20.74
20.75
21.38
21.74
22.03
21.75
Inulas
20.45
20.86
20.52
20.60
20.26
20.43
21.23
20.32
20.97
20.93
Upper Trade
20.45
21.27
20.22
20.45
20.52
20.60
21.31
21.01
21.45
21.32
Lower Trade
24.13
25.01
23.39
24.28
24.41
24.60
24.94
24.64
25.12
25.35
Segment Contribution (%Vol)
+
All
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Price
19.1
19.0
19.1
19.1
19.2
19.1
19.1
19.0
19.0
19.0
Health
24.7
24.7
24.7
24.6
24.7
24.7
24.7
24.7
24.6
24.8
Functional
27.4
27.4
27.4
27.4
27.3
27.3
27.4
27.5
27.4
27.4
Connoisseur
28.8
28.9
28.8
28.8
28.8
28.9
28.9
28.9
29.0
28.8
Trade Contribution (%Vol)
+
Total Trade
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Fujimart
31.5
32.8
28.4
32.1
32.9
32.5
33.7
33.2
31.5
32.8
Inulas
27.9
35.7
25.7
27.9
28.2
29.7
32.4
35.2
37.6
37.5
Upper Trade
59.3
68.5
54.1
59.9
61.1
62.2
66.1
68.4
69.1
70.3
Lower Trade
40.7
31.5
45.9
40.1
38.9
37.8
33.9
31.6
30.9
29.7
Destiny teams are empowered with useful market information that is ported on custom designed, interactive, automated, online dashboards. They allow for the integration of market information from diverse sources in a manner that makes it easy and efficient to access and digest.
Destiny’s dashboards provide broad based information pertaining to market, trade, advertising and brand image, product development, and commercial details for the Ambrosia, Panacea and Hygenia markets. The content includes:
Market size in volume, value, share and price, with break-ups across segments and brands, within each retail chain.
Advertising Spend, Aided Advertising Awareness and Spontaneous Brand Awareness.
Advertising Message in terms of the Emphasis on different image attributes.
Brand Image ratings.
Brand Profile.
Product Composition in terms of the % of each ingredient for each brand.
Ingredient Cost.
Product Performance in terms of utility.
Trade analysis includes chain performance across categories and manufacturers.
Trade Purchases and Stock levels across chains.
Trade Promotions.
Banner Image Ratings.
The Destiny market report which is updated after each decision cycle is configured as a collection of the following dashboards:
This dashboard is specially configured for reviewing market trends. The report enables you
to gauge the size of the market, its growth rate, and the performance of retailers,
manufacturers, brands, channels and segments. It covers information on sales volume, sales
value and price, across all channels and chains, and across all segments. If you are
interested in reviewing a particular event or development, such as the growth or decline of
a brand, you’ll want to first examine the trend in the market as a whole, and then review
the same across channels, banners and segments.
... less
The trade, purchase and promotion dashboards provide for a detailed review of the performance of the retail chains and the lower trade. The information provided includes:
Sales Volume and Sales Value contribution across retail chains and channels, and across shopper segment.
Store Count.
Store Maintenance.
Purchases table provides information across brands on Sales Volume, Purchases, Stocks and Out Of Stock Days. This information is required by retailers for making purchasing decisions, and it is required by manufacturers for determining how much to produce.
Promotion Rating Points table provides information on which brands the retailer is supporting through what promotions.
The product dashboard provides details on the product ingredient composition, cost of ingredients, product utility (product quality) and utility index, and is ideally suited for product development.
Comparison between a product’s utility index and price index provides an understanding of the price performance gap. The break-up of costs across ingredients is useful for making trade-offs between product quality and material costs.
... less
The Brand dashboards are configured for diagnosing the health of a brand. It provides in a single report, a drilldown of the measures (Price, Utility, Advertising Spend, Brand Image rating and profile, Promotion Rating Points, OOS Days, Purchases and Stocks) driving brand sales. ... less